COMPARITIVE STUDY OF ABSORBABLE WITH NON ABSORBABLE SUTURES IN CLOSURE OF LAPAROTOMY INCISIONS : A STUDY OF 100 CASES
Abstract
Background: This study is conducted to compare the absorbable with non absorbable sutures in wound dehiscence after closure of Laparotomy incisions
Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted in the department of general surgery, Dr PDMMC Amravati, Maharashtra in 1 year duration from January 2018 to January 2019. Mean was calculated for numerical data like age and Body Mass Index categorical data like gender, Anemia etc effect modification or association of outcome variables with effect modifiers.
Results: In this study, a total number of 100 patients were included, divided into two equal groups, 50 in each i.e. group Prolene and group Vicryl. In our study, wound dehiscence occurred in 3 cases in whom Prolene was used whereas 10 cases had wound dehiscence with the use of Vicryl suture. Vicryl was followed by significantly higher incidence of wound dehiscence than closure by Prolene
Conclusions: Observation of our study concluded that non absorbable Prolene has better outcome and less wound dehiscence and other complication as compared to absorbable Vicryl suture.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berrios-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35 Suppl 2:S66-88.
Rajapandian S, Bhushan C, Sabnis SC, Jain M, Raj PP, Parathasarthi R, et al. Single incision multiport versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A matched comparison. J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jul 7.
Giordano S, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis. Surgery. 2017;161(2):499-508.
Bochyńska A, Hannink G, Grijpma DW, Buma P. Tissue adhesives for meniscus tear repair: an overview of current advances and prospects for future clinical solutions. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(5):85.
Limura E, Giordano P. Biological Implant for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Single Institution Experience and Review of Literature. World J Surg. 2017 May 30.
Lunceford B. Ethical Dimensions of Cosmetic Surgery. International J Technoethics. 2016;7(2):28- 47.
Dennis C, Sethu S, Nayak S, Mohan L, Morsi YY, Manivasagam G. Suture materials—Current and emerging trends. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2016;104(6):1544-59.
Sectorectomy TLAA, Honda G, Kurata M, Okuda Y, Kobayashi S. Abstracts of the 21st International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Vienna, Austria, 19–22 June 2013. Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28 Suppl 1:1-469.
Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN. The modern management of incisional hernias.BMJ. 2012 May 9;344:e2843
Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Thomson S, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 2014;17(6):571-98.
Pandey S, Singh M, Singh K, Sandhu S. A prospective randomized study comparing non-absorbable polypropylene (ProleneR) and delayed absorbable polyglactin 910 (VicrylR) suture material in mass closure of vertical laparotomy wounds. Ind J Surg. 2013;75(4):306-10.
Penninckx FM, Poelmans SV, Kerremans RP, Beckers JP. Abdominal wound dehiscence in gastroenterological surgery. Ann surg. 1979;189(3):345-52.
McGinn F. Effects of haemorrhage upon surgical operations. Br J Surg. 1976;63(10):742-6.
Chalya PL, Massinde AN, Kihunrwa A, Mabula JB. Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jun 30;8:281.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.