COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS FENTANYL VS. INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE TO ATTENUATE EXTUBATION RESPONSE IN ADULT PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLINDED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
Abstract
Introduction: Complications during and after extubation are more common than during tracheal intubation and induction of anaesthesia.
Hypertension and tachycardia are common events during extubation. Endotracheal extubation can be associated with arrhythmias, myocardial
ischemia and raised intracranial pressures due to sympathetic stimulation.
Aim: To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on airway reflexes and hemodynamic responses during tracheal extubation in
patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia.
Materials and Methods: 60 patients of either sex, ASA grade I -II normotensive, aged 20-60 years undergoing elective general surgeries under
general anaesthesia were randomized into 2 groups comprising of 30 patients each- Group D (dexmedetomidine group) and Group F (Fentanyl
Group). Anaesthetic technique was standardized. 15 min before the expected last surgical suture , patients received dexmedetomidine 0.75 μg/kg
IV over 10 minutes (dexmedetomidine group) or fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV over 10 minutes (fentanyl group). HR, SBP, DBP, RR and SPO2 were
recorded before, during and after extubation.
Results: Statistically significant lesser increase in HR, SBP, DBP, and RR were noted after extubation in the dexmedetomidine group than the
fentanyl group. Dexmedetomidine group had better extubation quality than the fentanyl group. Bradycardia in one case observed with
dexmedetomidine group than the fentanyl group but none required intervention.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 0.75mcg/kg in 100 ml 0.9% normal saline administered 15 minutes before tracheal extubation was better
compared to Inj. Fentanyl 1 mcg/kg in 100 ml 0.9% normal saline in attenuating the extubation response with comparable adverse effects. Hence,
dexmedetomidine infusion can be a safer alternative to fentanyl infusion for attenuating extubation stress response.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Derbyshire DR, Chmielewski A, Fell D, Vater M, Achola K, Smith G. Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1983 Sep 1;55(9):855-60.
Russell WJ, Drew S, Morris R, Frewin D. Changes in plasma catecholamine concentrations during endotracheal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1981 Aug 1;53(8):837-9.
Amutharani R, Manoharan T,Manickavasagam P, Anandan H. Comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous fentanyl toattenuate the hemodynamic stress response to trachealextubation. Indian J ClinAnaesth 2019;6(2):242-7.
Lowrie A, Johnston PL, Fell D, Robinson SL. Cardiovascular and plasma catecholamine responses at tracheal extubation. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1992 Mar 1;68(3):261-3.
Minogue SC, Ralph J, Lampa MJ. Laryngotrachealtopicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases theincidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesia.AnesthAnalg 2004;99:1253-7.
Cook TM, Scott S, Mihai R. Litigation related to airway and respiratory complications of anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995–2007.Anaesthesia2010; 65: 556–63.2.
Asai T, Koga K, Vaughan RS. Respiratory complications associated with tracheal intubation and extubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; 80: 767–75.
Liyakhath Ali, SiddhramJamgond, Jagadish M. B. “Attenuation of Hemodynamic Stress Response During Emergence from General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2014 Nov; 3(62):13686-13696
Mirakhur RK, Dundee JW. Glycopyrrolate: pharmacology and clinical use. Anaesthesia. 1983 Dec;38(12):1195-204
Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. British journal of anaesthesia. 1987 Mar 1;59(3):295-9.
Rose DK, Cohen MM, Wigglesworth DF, De Boer DP. Critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Patient, surgical, and anesthetic factors. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 410–8.4.
Mhyre JM, Riesner MN, Polley LS, Naughton NN. A series of anesthesia-related maternal deaths in Michigan, 1985-2003.Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 1096–104.5
Rani P, Hemanth Kumar VR, Ravishankar M, Sivashanmugam T, Sripriya R, Trilogasundary M. Rapid and reliable smooth extubation – Comparison of fentanyl with dexmedetomidine: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:597-601.
Jayshree P Vaswani, Debasis Debata, Varsha Vyas, Surekha Pattil; Comparative Study of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Vs. Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery; Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017 Sep, Vol-11(9): UC04-UC08.
Aksu R, Akin A, Biçer C, Esmaoğlu A, Tosun Z, Boyaci A. Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on airway reflexes and hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation during rhinoplasty: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study. CurrTher Res Clin Exp. 2009;70(3):209–220.
Lovina Neil, Ashok Patel; Effect of Dexmedetomidine versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study; Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017 Apr, Vol-11(4): UC01-UC04.
Bajwa SS, Kaur J, Singh A, Parmar SS, Singh G, Kulshrestha A, et al. Attenuation of pressor response and dose sparing of opioids and anaesthetics with preoperative dexmedetomidine. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56:123-8.
Yildiz M, Tavlan A, Tuncer S, Reisli R, Yosunkaya A, Otelcioglu S. Effect of dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: perioperative haemodynamics and anaesthetic requirements. Drugs RD 2006;7:43-52.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.