ETHICAL ISSUES IN CONDUCTING PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN PEDIATRIC POPULATION

Dr. Vishal Shrishail Kudagi, Dr. Shruti Shivakumar, Dr. Harsha Raj B S, Anitha Subbappa

Abstract


There has always been a strong correlation between childhood behavior and experiences and adult psychological well-being. Therefore, children are used in psychological research in order to gain better understanding of functioning and development of human mind. However, children are more vulnerable to psychological harm than adults and lack ability in decision making processes. This makes conducting psychological research in pediatric population challenging especially in relation to the ethical aspect of the study.

The researcher must take the moral responsibility to understand various issues regarding ethical consent in children and protect the confidentiality of the study. Researchers should respect the rights and dignity of the children participating and emphasize on efficient communication that can help go a long way in successful research outcomes. Being sensitive to the potential impact of the study’s interventions and minimizing the effects is very important. There should also be a zero tolerance approach to any kind of deception in the psychological study.

Our presentation aims to revisit and discuss these sensitive issues when conducting psychological research in children which can guide researchers to design the study keeping the privacy and interests of the child as paramount.


Keywords


ethics , psychological research, consent, pediatric research, vulnerable population.

Full Text:

PDF

References


McLeod SA. Psychology Research Ethics. 2007.Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/Ethics.html

Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society. Code of Ethics and Conduct. 2009;Leicester: BPS.

Roth-Cline MD, Gerson J, Bright P, Lee CS, Nelson RM. (In Press) Ethical considerations in conducting pediatric research. In H Seyberth, A Rane, M Schwab, (Eds.) Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology. 1st Edition. Springer.

Kipnis K. Seven vulnerabilities in the pediatric research subject. Theor Med Bioeth.2003; 24 (2):107-120.

Kodish E . Pediatric ethics and early-phase childhood cancer research: conflicted goals and the prospect of benefit. Account Res. 2003; 10 (1):17-25

Kopelman LM .Children as research subjects: a dilemma. J Med Philos. 2000;25 (6):745-764

Lie RK, Emanuel E, Grady C, Wendler D. The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion. J Med Ethics.2000; 30 (2):190-193

Bartholome W.Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research. In: Vanderpool HY (ed) The Ethics of Research Involving Human Subjects.1996; University Publishing Group.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (1998; with 2000, 2002 and 2005 amendments) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Canadian Institutes of Health Research - Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/policystatement/introduction.cfm. Accessed December 10, 2010

Carroll TW, Gutmann MP .The Limits of Autonomy: The Belmont Report and the History of Childhood. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2010;

Ainsworth MD, Bell SM. Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development.1970; 41, 49-67.

Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society. Code of Ethics and Conduct. 2009;Leicester: BPS.

King NM, Cross AW. Children as decision makers: Guidelines for pediatricians. Journal of Pediatrics.1989; 115, 10-16.

Medical Research Council. The Ethical Conduct of Research on Children. 1991;London: MRC.

Takahashi K . Examining the Strange-Situation procedure with Japanese mothers and 12-month old infants. Developmental Psychology.1986;22, 265-270.

Watson JB. and Rayner R. Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology.1920; 3, 1, pp. 1–14.

Melton GB, Koocher GP, Saks MJ. Children's competence to consent.(1983). New York: Plenum Press.

Morrissey J M, Hofmann AD, Thrope JC. Consent and confidentiality in the health care of children and adolescents: A legal guide. 1986;New York: The Free Press

DHHS . Sixth annual report on carcinogens: summary 1991. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences,1991; pp. 357-364.

Wendler , Franklin G, Miller. Deception in the Pursuit of Science .Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(6):597-600.

Moreno JD. Goodbye to all that. The end of moderate protectionalism in human subjects research. Hastings Cent Rep. 2001;31:9-17

Miller FG, Picker D, and Rosenstein DL. Addressing ethical issues in psychiatric research literature. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56: 763-764

Rennie D, Yaank . Disclosure to the reader of institutional review boardapproval and informed consent. JAMA1997;277:922-923

Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. Nengl J Med. 1966;274:1354-1360

Levine RJ. Ethics and regulation of clinical research. 2nd. Yale UniversityPress, New Haven ;1986:27-31

Singer E, Thurn DV, Miller ER. confidentiality assurances and response- A quantitative review of the experimental literature. Public Opin Q. 1995; 59 (1): 66-77.

Nosek B A, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG. E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues.2002;58: 161–176.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.