TWO PORT MINI LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY COMPARED WITH STANDARD FOUR-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Dr. Dinesh Prasad, Dr. Shivamshekhar Singh

Abstract


Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy decreases postoperative pain, allows earlier oral intake, shortens hospital stay, and improves cosmesis over open
cholecystectomy.
Objectives: To evaluate difference between two port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding
intraoperative and post operative complications and morbidity due to sugery (if any).
Methods: Patients were diagnosed Gallbladder stones who were posted for surgery were included in our study after taking consent in which around
66 patients were selected.
Results: In two port LC, mean age was 35.81 + 16.1 years and in four port LC, mean age was 36.84 + 26.14 years,mean time of surgery of 2 port LC
is 62.09+10.6 min and of 4 port LC 57.15+8.2 min,with minimal conversion rate in 2 port LC(1 case) and none in 4LC group,.The mean
postoperative pain (vas) at 48 hours, in 2 port LC is 3.75 + 2.0 and in 4 port LC is 4.82 +0.78.Postoperative analgesia (mean) in 2 port LC
169.69+145.64 and in 4 port LC 236.36+97.7. All patients of 2 port LC were mobilized on day 1, whereas 23 patients of 4 port LC were mobilized
on day 1 and remaining 10 patients on day 2.
Conclusions: 2 port LC resulted in less post operative pain, less post operative requirement of analgesia, with comparable operative time, intra
operative complications, when compared to 4 port LC.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Glenn F,Grafe WR Jr, Historical events in biliary tract surgery. Arch Surg 1966Nov;93:848-52

Mouret P: from the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery. The prospective futures. Diag Surg (1991); 8:124.

Litynski G. Profiles in laparoscopy Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe 19871988 JSLS / Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1999, 3:163-167

Guruswamy K S, Samraj K, Fugia, Davidson BR: Robotic assistance for lap cholecystectomy. Cochrane database for systematic review (2009); CD006578

P Rossi, W Bugiantella, L Graziosi, Emanuel C, Annibale D: Transvaginal laparoscopic assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy-report of 3 cases. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2008); 68

McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J et al: A primer on natural orifice trans-luminal endoscopic surgery- building a new paradigm Sag Innov. (2006); 13:86-93.

Rao GV and Reddy N: Trans-gastric appendectomy in humans. Oral presentation at Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Conference in Dallas, Texas, (2006).

Pearl JR, Ponsky JL: Natural orifice trans-luminal endoscopic surgery. Past, present and future. J Min Access Surg (2007); 3: 43-6.

Cuschieri A et al: The European Experience with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Am J Surg (1991); 161:385-7.

. Shehadi W H The biliary system through the edges. Int Surg 1979;64:6311)

Comparative study between two-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy Ayman M. Elwan, Mohammed A. Abomera, Nagah S. Atwa and Mahmoud A. Abo Al Makarem Journal of the Arab Society for Medical Research 2013, 8:33–37 .

Sreenivas, Mohil RS, Singh GJ, Arora JK, Kandwal V, Chouhan J. Two-port mini laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Min Access Surg 2014;10:190-6

Wani M, Wani H, Shahdhar M, Hameed S, Mir S, Magray M. Two port and four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Differences in outcome. Arch Int Surg 2014;4:72-7


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.