COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIPASA SCORE VS RADIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is dened as inammation of vermiform appendix and is one of the
commonest cause of abdominal pain seen in emergencies.The present study was planned to compare
RIPASA scoring system, which is based on purely clinical and laboratory ndings vs radiological investigations such us
ultrasound (USG) abdomen and pelvis, and contrast enhanced computer tomography (CECT) keeping in mind to effectively
reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients admitted in General surgery department undergoing open appendicectomy, MGM
Government hospital,trichy for a period of 2 year . RIPASA score, USG abdomen and pelvis and Contrast enhanced Computer
topography are done to all patients undergoing Emergency open appendectomy under regional or general anaesthesia.
RESULTS: P value on comparing RIPASA vs USG abdomen shows a statistical signicance RIPASA score. P value on comparing
RIPASA vs CECT abdomen shows no statistical signicance.
CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that CECT is the optimum diagnostic tool for Acute Appendicitis compared with
RIPASA and USG abdomen.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cuscheri A. The small intestine and vermiform appendix. In: Cuschieri A, Giles GR, Mossa AR, eds. Essential Surgical Practice, 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinermann, 1995:1297-1329.
Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Connecticut Med. 1999 Mar;63(3):137-40.
Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann Roy Coll Surg Eng. 1994 Nov;76(6):418.
Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, et al. Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of 9. acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2010 Mar 1;51(3):220.
Fitz RH. Perforating inflatmmation of the vermiform appendix; with special Reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1886;92:321-46.
McBurney CH. IV. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894 Jul;20(1):38.
Ochsner AJ. A Handbook of Appendicitis, 2nd ed, Chicago: GP Engelhard & Company;1906.
Iqbal J, Khan MH, UlMukim R, Nisar A, Iqbal M. Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. 2009;25(3);180-4.
Bhabatosh D, Singh G, SambhajiKh, Lekshmipriya L, Singh RL, Sharma LK. Comparison between RIPASA and Alvarado score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicites. Int J Curr Res. 2016(8);1:25538-546.
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendicectomy in United States. Am J Epidemiology; 132: 910-25.
Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: Nationwide analysis Arch Surg 2002; 137(7): 799-804.
Mardan MAA, Mufti TS, Khattak IU, Chikunda N, Alshayeb AA, Mohammad AM et al. Role of Ultrasound in acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll 2007; 19(3): 72-9.
Chong CF, Adil MIW, Thien A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJA, Tin AS et al. Development of the RIPASA score: A new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 2010; 51: 220-5.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.