EFFECT OF DIFFERENT STORAGE MEDIA ON THE BOND STRENGTH OF FRACTURED PARTS BEFORE RE-ATTACHMENT: AN IN VITRO STUDY.

Dr Renuka Praveen Chinchalkar, Dr Rushikesh Ramesh Mahaparale, Dr Rahul Rajendra Chaudhari, Dr Pradeep Ashok Kumar Bapna, Dr Nakul Hemant Malgundkar, Dr Saleem D. Makandar

Abstract


AIM: The aim of this study was to examine various storage environments for storing fragments before being bonded to the remaining teeth.

 MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty maxillary incisor teeth were fractured on the incisal one-third and were divided into four groups of 10 each to be stored in normal saline, milk, coconut water and dry environments for 24 hours. All the fractured parts in each group were bonded to their relevant apical parts by an etch and rinse bonding system and a flowable composite resin. The fracture resistance was measured by a universal testing machine, and the results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey statistical tests.

RESULTS: The results revealed that the difference among the four groups was statistically significant (P=0.000). Tukey tests showed that the force required for fracturing fragments kept in the milk environments were significantly higher than those for the normal saline, coconut water and dry environments (P>0.05 ).

CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that keeping the fractured parts in milk storage environment can increase the required force for fracturing teeth more than the other environments

Keywords


fragment, milk, coconut water, normal saline.

Full Text:

PDF

References


David Ditto Sharmin, Eapen Thomas. Evaluation of the effect of storage medium on fragment reattachment. Dent Traumatol. 2013; 29: 99-102.

Claudia Ines Capp, Maria Inez Roda, Regina Tamaki, Gisela MuassabCastanho, Maite Andre Camargo, Antonio Alberto de Cara. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques. Dent Traumatol. 2009; 25: 95-9.

FarzanehShirani, Mohammad Reza Malekipour, Dana Tahririan, VahidSakhaeiManesh. Effect of storage environment on the bond strength of reattachment of crown fragments to fractured teeth.J Conserv Dent. 2013;14: 269-72.

YucelYilmaz, CigdemZehir, OzgeEyuboglu, NihalBelduz. Evaluation of success in the reattachment of coronal fractures. Dent Traumatol. 2008; 24: 151-8.

Andreasen FM, Noren JG, Andreasen JO, Engelhardtsen S, Lindh-Stromberg U. Longterm survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study.Quint Int. 1995;26:669–681.

Macedo GV, Diaz PI, De O, Fernandes CA, Ritter AV. Reattachment of anterior teeth fragments: a conservative approach. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20:5–18; discussion 19- 20.

Reis A, Kraul A, Francci C, et al. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27:621–627.

Marino TG, West LA, Liewehr FR, et al. Determination of periodontal ligament cell viability in long shelf-life milk. J Endod. 2000;26:699–702.

Harkacz OM Sr, Carnes DL Jr, Walker WA 3rd. Determination of periodontal ligament cell viability in the oral rehydration fluid gatorade and milks of varying fat content. J Endod. 1997;23:687–690.

Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, Kreiborg S. Drying and rewetting anterior crown fragments prior to bonding. Endod DentTraumatol. 1999;15:113–116.

F.Shirani, V SakheiManesh, MR Malekipour. Preservation of coronal tooth fragments prior to reattachment. Aust Dent J. 2013;58:321-5.

Capp CI, Roda MI, Tamaki R, Castanho GM, Camargo MA, deCara AA. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25:95-9.

Mohammad Reza Malekipour, FarzanehShirani, ParvanehBahrami.The effect of different preservation environments on shear bond strength of fractured parts before re-attachment. Journal of Isfahan Dental School. 2009; 4:179-84.

AndreasenF,&Andreasen J (2007) Crown fractures In: Andreasen J, Andreasen F, &Andersson L (eds) Textbook and Color Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth Blackwell Munksgaard, Oxford, UK 280-313. .

Badami AA, Dunne SM, Scheer B. An in vitro investigation into the shear bond strengths of two dentin bonding agents used in the reattachment of incisal edge fragments. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995;11:129-35.

Reis A, Francci C, Loguercio AD, Carrilho MR, Rodriguez Filho LE. Reattachment of anterior teeth: fracture strength using different techniques. Oper Dent. 2001;26:287-94.

Reis A, Loguercio AD, Kraul A, Matson E. Reattachment of fractured teeth: A review of literature regarding techniques and materials. Oper Dent. 2004;29:226-33.

Giriyappa RH, Chandra BS. Comparative evaluation of self-etching primers with fourth and fifth generation dentin-bonding systems on carious and normal dentin substrates: An in vitro shear bond strength analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2008;11:154-8.

Chu FCS, Yim TM, Wei SHY. Clinical considerations for reattachment of tooth fragments. Quint Int. 2000; 31:385-391.

Sharmin DD, Thomas E.Evaluation of the effect of storage medium on fragment reattachment. Dental Traumatol. 2012; 29:99-102.

Wilson Roberto Poi, CelsoKoogiSonoda, Christine Men Martins, Moriel Evangelista Melo, Eduardo Pizza Pellizzer, Marcos Rogerio de Mendonca, Sonia Regina Panzarini. Storage Media For Av u l s e d Te e t h : A L i t e r a t u r e Review. Braz Dent J. 2013; 24: 437-45.

Pusman E, Cehreli ZC, Altay N, Unver B, Saracbasi O, Ozgun G. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials. Dent Traumatol. 2010; 26: 9–15.

O'Donnell JN, Schumacher GE, Antonucci JM, Skrtic D. Adhesion of amorphous calcium phosphate composites bonded to dentin: A study in failure modality. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;90:238-49.

Arhun N, Ungor M. Re-attachment of a fractured tooth: A case report. Dent Traumatol. 2007; 23: 322-6.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.