COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND ETOMIDATE-LIPURO IN CONTROLLED HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS

Dr Kunal Sharma

Abstract


Background: The aim of this study was to compare propofol with etomidate- lipuro as an induction agent to evaluate hemodynamic changes during induction of anesthesia in controlled hypertensive patients.

Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted to evaluate sixty patients with ASA I and II who were randomly allocated into two groups i.e. Group P and Group E. Before anesthesia induction, all patients were premedicated. Anesthesia induction included Group P in which patients received propofol 2mg/kg and Group E in which patients received etomidate 0.3mg/kg. The hemodynamic changes including heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure were accessed at various time intervals. Any adverse event like pain during injection, myoclonus etc. were noted.

Results: Comparing the two groups it was seen that after induction the heart rate did not change significantly in etomidate group, but in propofol group it decreased significantly compared to the pre-induction value. The fall in blood pressure (SBP, DBP, MAP) after induction in Group-E was less than that seen in Group-P. In etomidate group SBP, DBP and MAP did not change significantly after induction as compared to pre-induction where as SBP, DBP and MAP decreased significantly post-induction in propofol group.

 Conclusion: Incidence of hemodynamic change is significantly lower in group E as compared to Group P hence Etomidate is better than propofol in maintaining the heart rate and blood pressure in controlled hypertensive patients during induction of general anesthesia

Keywords


Diastolic blood pressure; Systolic blood pressure; Etomidate-lipuro; Propofol

Full Text:

PDF

References


Riznyk L, Fijałkowska M, Przesmycki K (2005) Effects of thiopental and propofol on heart rate variability during fentanyl-based induction of general anesthesia.Pharmacol Rep 57: 128-134.

Basu S, Mutschler DK, Larsson AO, Kiiski R, Nordgren A, et al. (2001) Propofol (Diprivan-EDTA) counteracts oxidative injury and deterioration of the arterial oxygen tension during experimental septic shock.Resuscitation 50: 341-348.

Schaub E, Kern C, Landau R. Pain on injection: a double-blind comparison of propofol with lidocaine pretreatment versus propofol formulated with long and medium-chain triglycerides. Anesth Analg 2004;99(6):1699-702

M. Sarkar, P.C. Laussen, D. Zurakowski, et al.Hemodynamic responses to etomidate on induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients Anesth Analg, 101 (2005), pp. 645-650

J. Morel, M. Salard, C. Castelain, et al.Haemodynamic consequences of etomidate administration in elective cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blinded study. Br J Anaesth, 107 (2011), pp. 503-509

Paris, M. Philipp, P.H. Tonner, et al.Activation of alpha 2B-adrenoceptors mediates the cardiovascular effects of etomidate Anesthesiology, 99 (2003), pp. 889-895

T.K. Kim, I.S. ParkComparative study of brain protection effect between thiopental and etomidate using bispectral index during temporary arterial occlusion J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 50 (2011), pp. 497-502

Baird CR, Hay AW, McKeown DW, Ray DC. Rapid sequence induction in the emergency department: induction drug and outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(8):576-579.

Zed PJ, Abu-Laban RB, Harrison DW. Intubating Conditions and Hemodynamic Effects of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: an observational cohort study. Acad Emerg Med j. 2006;13(4):378-383

Y. Nyman, K. Von Hofsten, C. Palm, et al.Etomidate-Lipuro is associated with considerably less injection pain in children compared with propofol with added lidocaine Br J Anaesth, 97 (2006), pp. 536-539

Budde A, Mets B. Pro: Etomidate is the ideal induction agent for a cardiac anesthetic. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(1):180-183

Gooding JM, Corssen G: Effect of etomidate on the cardiovascular system. Anesth Analg 1977; 56:717-719

Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, et al. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology 1992;76(5):725-33

Aggarwal S, Goyal VK, Chaturvedi SK, et al. A comparative study between propofol and etomidate in patients under general anesthesia. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology 2016; 66(3):237-41.

Soliman HF. Bispectral index-guided induction of anesthesia by ketofol infusion provides the same cardiovascular stability like that of etomidate infusion. Ains Shams Journal of Anaesthesiol 2015;8(3):341-8.

Shah SB, Chowdhury I, Bhargava AK, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of intravenous etomidate versus propofol during induction and intubation using entropy guided hypnosis levels. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015; 31(2):180-5.

Saricaoglu F, Uzun S, Arun O, Arun F, Aypar U. A clinical comparison of etomidate-lipuro, propofol and admixture at induction. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5:62–6.

Kaushal Kabir et al, Indian journal of clinical anaesthesia, 2017; 4(1); 41-45. A prospective study to compare cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation after induction by propofol and etomidate


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.