APPRAISAL OF STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF PROSTHODONTIC LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN MORADABAD, NORTH INDIA.

Dr. Siddhi Tripathi, Dr. Kanesha Abrol, Dr. Swatantra Agarwal, Dr. Rachna Maheshwari, Dr. Nimra Mehraj, Dr. Ashish Sharma

Abstract


Objectives: Dental curriculum especially prosthodontics is elaborative, challenging and difficult to conceptualize while co-relating theoretical
and clinical aspects. In this regard, students constitute a stakeholder group that provides unique information concerning effectiveness of the dental
curriculum. Hence, a study was conducted to elicit and compare the differences in perception of the prosthodontic learning environment between
the preclinical and clinical years of under-graduate curriculum and between under-graduate and post-graduate students of prosthodontics in a
dental teaching institute in Moradabad, India.
Methods: A total number of 400 students participated in the study. A sixty-item closed-ended DCLES cross-sectional questionnaire was completed
by the dental graduates (including interns) and post-graduate students. The data obtained was statistically analyzed.
Results: With regard to perception of the prosthodontic learning environment statistically significant differences were found in flexibility,
supportiveness, meaningful experience, organization and breadth of interest between pre-clinical and clinical years of undergraduate students
(p<0.05). When under-graduates and post-graduates were compared, significant differences were found in student to student interaction and
emotional climate.
Conclusion: The study highlighted the areas of strength and weakness from student's perspective within a teaching dental institute. Identification
of these areas can provide prosthodontic dental educators, a road map for quality enhancement, curriculum revision and escalate student's
contentment with the learning environment in dental institution.


Keywords


Prosthodontics, education, dental, surveys and questionnaires, students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Divaris K, Barlow PJ, Chendea SA, Cheong WS. The academic environment: the students’ perspective. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12(1):120-30.

Stewart DW, de Vries J, Singer DL, Degen GG. Canadian dental students’ perceptions of their learning environment and psychological functioning over time. J Dent Educ 2006;70:972-81.

Till H. Climate studies: can students’ perceptions of the ideal educational environment be of use for institutional planning and resource utilization? Med Teach 2005;27: 332-3.

Jain L, Jain M, Mathur A, Paiwal K. Perceptions of dental students towards learning environment in an Indian scenario. Dent Res J 2010; 7(2): 56-63.

Shigli K, Jyotsna S, Rajesh G. Challenges in learning preclinical prosthodontics: A survey of perceptions of dental undergraduates and teaching faculty at an Indian dental school. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:ZC01-ZC05.

Haralur SB, Al-Malki AE. Student perception about efficacy of preclinical fixed prosthodontic training to facilitate smooth transition to clinical context. J Edu Health Promot 2014;3(73):1259.

Kamal S, Mamata H. Assessment of the learning environment in prosthodontic department based on Dental College Learning Environment Survey by the graduates of a dental institute in India. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2014;34:1-5.

Sukotjo C, Thambasitboon K, Howell H, Karimbux N. Students perception of prosthodontics in a PBL hybrid curriculum. J Prosthod 2008;17(6):495-501.

Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. Appraisal of the dental school learning environment: the students’ view. J Dent Educ 2005;69:1137-47.

Rothman AI, Ayoade F. The development of a learning environment: a questionnaire for use in curriculum evaluation. J Med Educ 1970;45:754-9.

Kember D, Leung DYP. Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learning Environ Res 2009;12:15-29.

Victoroff KZ, Hogan S. Students’ perceptions of effective learning experiences in dental school: a qualitative study using a critical incident technique. J Dent Educ 2006;70:124-32.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.