FETAL GESTATIONAL AGE ESTIMATION BY FETAL FOOT LENGTH MEASUREMENT AND FETAL FEMUR TO FOOT LENGTH RATIO IN SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ultrasonography is being a painless, non-invasive, non-ionizing, portable, redoable and relatively inexpensive modality used
to evaluate fetal growth parameter many times during pregnancy.
AIM: To assess relationship between sonographic gestational age and fetal FL and FL/FOOT LENGTH between 16 and 39 weeks of gestation and
to compare its accuracy with other biometric parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cross sectional study was performed on 500 normal singleton pregnancies at second and third
trimesters between 16-39 weeks. The study was conducted on a gray scale real-time ultrasound scanner using linear and sector transducers to
measure the standard fetal biometrics and fetal fetal FL and FL/FOOT LENGTH at our department of radiology , PES institute of medical sciences
whic is a rural medical college adjoining three states (Andhra Pradesh , Karnataka and Tamilnadu).
RESULTS: Biparietal diameter (BPD), Head circumference (HC), Abdominal circumference (AC), and Femur length (FL) and Fetal FL and
FL/FOOT LENGTH were compared with standard charts and scatter graphs were plotted. Coefficient of correlation were calculated which were
0.9620, 0.8632, , 0.9853, 0.8648 for BPD, HC, AC, FL and FL/FOOT LENGTH respectively, proving them reliable indicators . FL measured in the
present study was compared with standard nomogram. A statistically significant curvilinear correlation was found between the FL and GA
indicating it to be a reliable indicator of GA. Significant coefficient of correlation (0. 0.920 4) was observed between FL and GA indicating it to be a
reliable parameter.
CONCLUSION: The HL was most accurate parameter next to FL in assessing GA. The study also indicates that combination of BPD, HC, AC, FL,
FL is more accurate in predicting GA than any single parameter, particularly in the third trimester of pregnancy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Beazley JM, Underhill RA. Fallacy of the fundal height. Br Med J 1970;4:404-6.
Andersen HF, Johnson TR Jr, Barclay ML, Flora JD Jr. Gestational age assessment. I. analysis of individual clinical observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;139:173-7.
Campbell J, Henderson A, Campbell S. The foetal femur/ foot length ratio: A new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988; 72 (2): 181-4.
Shalev E, Wener E, Zuckerman H, Megory E. Reliability of sonographic measurement of the fetal foot. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8(5):259-262.
K S Joshi, B Marahatta,et al. Fetal Foot Length and Femur/ Foot Length Ratio: Significance in Nepalese Context. Nepalese journal of Radiolgy 2011;1(1): 15- 22.
Streeter GL. Weight, sitting height, head size, foot length and menstrual age of the human embryo. Contrib embryo Cornegie Inst 1920; 11(3):143-170.
Meirowitz NB, Ananth CV, Smulian JC et al. Foot length in fetuses with abnormal growth. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19(3):201-205
Verburg BO, Steegers EA, Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:388-96.
Tahmasebpour AR, Pirjani R, Rahimi-Foroushani A, et al Normal ranges for fetal femur and humerus diaphysis length during the second trimester in an Iranian population. J Ultrasound Medicine. 2012;31(7):991-5.
Mukta Mital, Prashant Gupta et al. Fetal gestational age estimation by fetal foot length measurement and fetal femur to foot length ratio in indian population - a prospective study. J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci 2014; 3(10): 2621-2625
Paramila SVV, Shukla AK. Ultrasonographic estimation of foetal gestational age by humerus length and its comparison with femur length. J. Evid. Based Med. Healthc. 2016;3(74);4040-4.
Gaharwar A, Tiwari V. Correlation between Crown Rump Length of Fetus and Gestational Age in First Trimester of Pregnancy in North Indian Population. Int J Med Res Prof. 2019 May;5(3):102-4.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.