A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY AND STANDARD ENTERAL FEEDING AFTER BOWEL SURGERY.

Dr Hemant B. Janugade, Dr Jeffrey Carlton Monteiro

Abstract


Background :

As per routine protocol, patients operated for resection and anastomosis of intestine, are kept nil per os till intestine starts functioning. But evidence from clinical studies and animal experiments suggests that initiating enteral feeding early is beneficial to patient. Enteral nutrition, especially early enteral nutrition, could effectively increase the blood flow of gut mucosa, stimulate the intestinal motility, maintain the gut integrity, decrease the incidence of infectious complications, ameliorate patient’s outcome after surgery.

Methods :

The comparative study includes 80 cases of intestinal resection and anastomosis, operated at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad, Maharashtra, India, from August 2018 to July 2019 from which randomly 40 patients were selected for conventional nil per os approach and rest of 40 patients were given early enteral feeding within 1st 24 hours post operatively.

Results :

In the study most common age group, who undergone surgery in both case and control groups was between 51-60 years with male predominance in both groups. Most common surgery performed was right hemicolectomy for bowel malignancy in both groups. Case group had statistically significant low rate of wound infection, paralytic ileus and post-operative pain with less hospital stay. No significant difference in incidence of anastomotic dehiscence, intra-abdominal abscess or pneumonia was found.

Interpretation and Conclusion :

Early oral feeding is safe and if associated with careful selection and multimodal postoperative care promotes faster convalescence following bowel surgery.


Keywords


Enteral nutrition, nil per os, postoperative ileus, emergency intestinal surgery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lochs H, Dejong C, Hammarqvist F, Hebuterne X, Leon-Sanz M, Schütz T, van Gemert W, van Gossum A, Valentini L; DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine), Lübke H, Bischoff S, Engelmann N, Thul P; ESPEN (European Soci-ety for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition). ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: gastro-enterology. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 260-274.

Bakker OJ, van Brunschot S, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, Boermeester MA, De-jong CH, van Goor H, Bosscha K, Ahmed Ali U, Bouwense S, van Grevenstein WM, Heister-kamp J, Houdijk AP, Jansen JM, Karsten TM, Manusama ER, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Schaapher-der AF, van der Schelling GP, Schwartz MP, Spanier BW, Tan A, Vecht J, Weusten BL, Wit-teman BJ, Akkermans LM, Bruno MJ, Dijkgraaf MG, van Ramshorst B, Gooszen HG; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Early versus on-de-mand nasoenteric tube feeding in acute pan-creatitis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1983-1993.

Boelens PG, Heesakkers FF, Luyer MD, van Barneveld KW, de Hingh IH, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Roos AN, Rutten HJ. Reduction of postop-erative ileus by early enteral nutrition in pa-tients undergoing major rectal surgery: pro-spective, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 649-655.

Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H. En-hanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 466-477.

van Stijn MF, Boelens PG, Richir MC, Ligthart-Melis GC, Twisk JW, Diks J, Houdijk AP, van Leeuwen PA. Antioxidant-enriched enteral nu-trition and immuno-inflammatory response af-ter major gastrointestinal tract surgery. Br J Nutr 2010; 103: 314-318.

Sun JK, Mu XW, Li WQ, Tong ZH, Li J, Zheng SY. Effects of early enteral nutrition on immune function of severe acute pancreatitis patients. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 917-922.

Fujitani K, Tsujinaka T, Fujita J, Miyashiro I, Imamura H, Kimura Y, Kobayashi K, Kurokawa Y, Shimokawa T, Furukawa H; Osaka Gastroin-testinal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group. Prospective randomized trial of preoperative enteral immunonutrition followed by elective total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 621-629.

Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S. Early en-teral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroin-test Surg 2009; 13: 569-575.

Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early en-teral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Data-base Syst Rev 2006; CD004080.

Catchpole BN. Smooth muscle and the surgeon. Aust N Z J Surg.1989;59:199-208.

Moss G. Maintenance of gastrointestinal function after bowel surgery and immediate enteral full nutrition. II. Clinical experience, with objective demonstration of intestinal absorption and motility. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1981;5:215 -20.

McCarter MD, Gomez ME, Daly JM. Early postoperative enteral feeding following major upper gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg.1996;1:278-85.

Uden P, Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Impact of long term relative bowel rest on conditions for colonic surgery. Am J Surg. 1988;156:381 -5.

Irvin TT, Hunt TK. Effect of malnutrition on colonic healing. Ann Surg.1974;180:765-72.

Ward MW, Danzi M, Lewin MR, Rennie MJ, Clark CG. The effects of subclinical malnutrition and refeeding on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1982;69:308 -10.

Goodlad RA, AlMukhtar MY, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Wright NA. Cell proliferation, plasma enteroglucagon and plasma gastrin levels in starved and refed rats. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1983;43:55-62.

Moss G, Greenstein A, Levy S, Bierenbaum A. Maintenance of GI function after bowel surgery and immediate enteral full nutrition. I. Doubling of canine colorectal anastomotic bursting pressure and intestinal wound mature collagen content. Clinical experience, with objective demonstration of intestinal absorption and motility. J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1980;4:535 -8.

Schroeder D, Gillanders L,Mahr K, Hill GL. Effects of immediate post-operative enteral nutrition on body composition, muscle function, and wound healing. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1991;15:376-83.

Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colrectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;CD0040080.

Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, Fearon K, Weimann A, Bozzetti F. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr 2009;

-386.

Bankhead R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J, Lyman B, Metheny NA, Mueller C, Robbins S, Wessel J; A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Enteral nutrition practice recommendations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009; 33: 122-167.

Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon MA. Ear-ly versus traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing resectional gastrointesti-nal surgery: a meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011; 35: 473-487.

Boelens PG, Heesakkers FF, Luyer MD, van Barneveld KW, de Hingh IH, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Roos AN, Rutten HJ. Reduction of postop-erative ileus by early enteral nutrition in pa-tients undergoing major rectal surgery: pro-spective, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 649-655.

Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S. Early en-teral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroin-test Surg 2009; 13: 569-575.

Kaur N, Gupta MK, Minocha VR. Early enteral feeding by nasoenteric tubes in patients with perforation peritonitis. World J Surg 2005; 29: 1023-1027; discussion 1027-1028.

Singh G, Ram RP, Khanna SK. Early postopera-tive enteral feeding in patients with nontrau-matic intestinal perforation and peritonitis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 142-146.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.