STUDY OF IMPROVEMENT IN PAIN IN CONGENITAL PES PLANUS (FLAT FOOT) DUE TO CONSERVATIVE REHABILITATIVE MEASURES

Saumen Kumar De, Debangshu Bhakat, M. M. Biswas, Sunil Kumar Basu, Subhrajyoti Naskar

Abstract


Introduction: Pes planus is one of the commonest foot deformities during childhood. Pain is one of the commonest symptom in these patients. The pain becomes continuous and progressively worse leading to disability. This study was our humble attempt to put some light to assess the role of non-surgical treatment approaches in cases of congenital pes planus with respect to improvement in pain.

Methodology: This Prospective Randomized Open Label Control Trial was conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sambhu Nath Pandit Hospital, 11, Lala Lajpat Rai Sarani, Kolkata-700020 between December 2009 to November 2011 after getting Institutional Ethical Committee clearance. Proper consent was taken from the legal guardian of the patient. Confirmed cases congenital pes planus (flat foot) between 6 years to 18 years were included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and were being randomly subdivided into two (2) groups. One group (GROUP:1) of patients received: Exercise (Ex) therapy, Shoe Modification (SM) and Acetaminophen (paracetamol) S.O.S and the other group of  patients (GROUP :2) received :Exercise (Ex) therapy, Shoe Modification (SM), Electrical Stimulation in the form of  Faradic Foot Bath (FFB)and Acetaminophen (paracetamol) S.O.S and after initial visit followed up on 6th, 12th, 24th weeks; every time with respect to improvement in pain on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Results: There was statistically significant improvement (with p value less than 0.05) in pain scores in both the groups. Interesting observation in our study is that there is statistically significant improvement of pain score of group 1 patients is only evident after 6 weeks of treatment. Another interesting finding is that while comparing the numerical variables of group 1 and group 2 shows statistically significant improvement of pain score with p-value less than 0.05 from the beginning of the our study.

Conclusion: Faradic foot bath definitely improves the pain score in congenital pes planus (flat foot) with statistical significance of less than 0.05 (p value < 0.05). Conservative management like exercise and orthosis also statistically improves pain score after 6 weeks of treatment.


Keywords


Congenital Pes Planus (flat foot), Faradic Foot Bath (FFB), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score

Full Text:

PDF

References


Murphy GA. Pes Planus. In: Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics,11th.Edition. Canale ST & Beaty JH (eds.); Philadelphia, Mosby Elsevier 2008;4587-4618.

Kaplan LI. Shoe correction and foot pathology. In: Rehabilitation Medicine. Goodgold J (ed); ST. Louis, The C.V. Mosby Company 1988; 851-854

Lippert LS. Clinical kinesiology and Anatomy. 4th. Edition. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company (first Indian edition. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers); 2007: 265-283.

Jack EA. Naviculo-cuneiform fusion in the treatment of flatfoot. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1953;35B:75-82.

Adams JC, Hamblen DL. Pes planus (the leg, ankle, and foot). In: Outline of Orthopaedics.13th. Edition. Adams JC, Hamblen DL (eds.); London. Churchill Livingstone; 2001:519-528.

Bentley G, Shearer JR. In: Mercer’s Orthopaedic Surgery. Duthie RB, Bentley G (eds). 9th. Edition. Revised and updated by Dhal AK. New Delhi,Jaypee Brothers 2003;1193-1253.)

Samuel L. Turek, Flat Foot. 2nd. Edition. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven Publisher, (Indian edition distributed in India by Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.);1998:341-345, 1446-1450.

Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Breivik Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of Pain: Assessment of Pain Intensity and Pain Relief in Acute Pain.

Hosalkar HS, Spiegel DA, Davidson RS. The Foot and Toes. In: Nelson Textbook of Paediatrics. Vol. 2.18th ed. Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF (eds);Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier 2007;Chapter 673, pages 2776-2784.

Rome K, Ashford RL, Evans A. Non-surgical interventions for paediatric pes planus: Cochrane Database Systemic Review. European Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2010 Jul ;7:7.

Chen JP, Chung MJ, Wang MJ. Flatfoot prevalence and foot dimensions of 5- to 13- year-old children in Taiwan. Foot Ankle Int 2009 Apr;30(4):326-332.

Sachithanandam V, Joseph B. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 1846 skeletally mature persons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995 Mar;77(2):254-257.

Rose GK. Flat feet in children.Br Med J 1990;301:1330–1331.

Gabriel K. Congenital and acquired disorders. In: AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices. 4th. Edition. Hsu JD, Michel JW, Fisk JR (eds.); Philadelphia, Mosby Elsevier 2008; 451-464.

Hrnnessey WJ. Lower limb orthosis (pes planus). In: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 3rd. Edition. Braddom RL (ed); St. Louis,Missouri, Saunders Elsevier 2007;344-345.

Bistevins R. Footwear and Footwear Modifications. In: Krusen’s Hand Book Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation. 4th. Edn. Wickland EH, Jr.(ed); Philadelphia,W.B. Saunders Company, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,Inc.1990;971-972.

Cowell HR. Shoe and shoe corrections. Pediatr Clin North Am 1977;24:791-797.

Basmajian JV. Exercise in Foot Disabilities. In:Basmajian JV (ed).Therapeutic Exercise. 4th. Edition Baltimore/London,Williamsand Wilkins: 19--:519-528.

Low J, Reed A. Electrotherapy Explained-Principles and Practice. 4th edition. London. Butteerworth Heinemann.2006; 1st Indian edition. Noida, U.P. Elsevier 2009; 56-57.

Ted Li and William Thng. An evaluation of the effectiveness Faradic stimulation (faradic footbath) in treating flat foot. Hong Kong Polytechnic 1988;10:43.

Apley AG. Flat Foot. The Post-Graduate Medical Journal 1937;29:257.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.