THE CHANGING PARADIGM OF INJURIES AND THEIR OUTCOME IN AN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT ZONE

Pawan Sharma, Abhishek Sharma, K R Rao

Abstract


Background: The characteristics of combat injuries differ from those encountered in civilian practice in terms of epidemiology, mechanism of wounding, pathophysiology, trajectory after injury and outcome. Furthermore, the nature of combat injuries is likely to change because of changes in the ways wars will be fought; such changes may influence therapeutic tactics and techniques, and military medical planning and logistics. Proper medical deployment at various peacekeeping missions requires projecting injuries. For this reason, the injury patterns and mechanism of injury were reviewed over a five year  period, and injury rates and mechanisms were extracted for review.

 

Methods: An observational study of 2942 trauma cases attending trauma Out Patient Department and emergency centre of United Nations Peacekeeping Mission Hospital in eastern DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo),was carried out  from  Jan 2009 to Dec 2013. The study included age profile of patients along with the distribution and mechanism of injuries.

 

Results: Penetrating injuries and blunt injuries accounted for 4.65% and 95.35% respectively of the total injuries sustained. The majority of the patients sustained injuries like mixed burns and inhalation injuries, assaults and contusions (84.33%). The most common age group affected was 22- 29 years (60.74%).

 

Conclusions: The data clearly demonstrate that humanitarian and peacekeeping missions require preparation for a wide variety of mechanisms of injuries including non combat trauma beyond the expected penetrating missile and blast injuries of a typical war  scenario.


Keywords


Trauma, Peacekeeping mission, Combat injuries

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bellamy RF. Combat trauma overview. In: Zajtchuk R, Grande CM, eds. Textbook of Military Medicine, Anesthesia and Perioperative Care of the Combat Casualty. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army; 1995:1–42.

Bellamy RF, Zajtchuk R. Assessing the effectiveness of conventional weapons. In: Bellamy RF, Zajtchuk R, eds. Textbook of Military Medicine, Conventional Warfare. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army; 1991:55–69

Murray, Clinton K. : Spectrum of care provided at an Echelon II Medical unit during Operation Iraqi freedom, Military Medicine 2005; 170 : 6:516

Dupuy TN. Attrition: Forecasting Battle Casualties and Equipment Losses in Modern War. Falls Church, VA: Nova Publications; 1995

Appenzeller, George N. : Injury Patterns in Peacekeeping Missions : The Kosovo Experience, Military Medicine 2004; 169: 187-91

Mabry RL, Holcomb JB, Baker AM, et al: United States Army Rangers in Somalia:an analysis of combat casualties on an urban battlefield. Trauma 2000; 49:515–29.

Meade P, Mirocha J: Civilian landmine injuries in Sri Lanka. Trauma 2000; 48:735–9.

Wound Data, and Munitions Effectiveness Team. The WDMET Study [1970 Original data are in the possession of the Uniformed ServicesUniversity of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD].

Bellamy RF. The causes of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty care research. Mil Med. 1984; 149:229–230.

Arnold K, Cutting RT. Causes of death in United States military personnel hospitalized in Vietnam. Mil Med. 1978;143:161–164.

Eastridge Brian J, Jenkins, Donald; Flaherty, Stephen; Schiller, Henry; Holcomb, John B : Trauma System Development in a Theater of war : Experiences from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2006; 61 : 1366-73

Champion, Howard R.; Bellamy, Ronald F.; Roberts , Colonel P; Leppaniemi, Ari : A Profile of Combat Injury, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2003; 54: S13-S19

Wolf S, Kauvar D, Wade C, Cancio L, Renz E, Horvath E, et al. Comparison between civilian burns and combat burns from operation Iraqi Freedom and operation Enduring Freedom. Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 786-795.

Ivey KM, White CE, Wallum TE, Aden JK, Cannon JW, Ching KK, et al. Thoracic injuries in US combat casualties: a 10-year review of Operation Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. J Trauma. 2012; 73: S514-519.

Berg R, Inaba K, Okoye O, Karamanos E, Strumwasser A, Chouliaras K, et al. The peril of thoracoabdominal firearm trauma: 984 civilian injuries reviewed. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 77(5): 684-691.

Morrison J, Midwinter M, Jansen J. Ballistic thoracoabdominal injury: analysis of recent military experience in Afghanistan. World J Surg. 2011; 35: 1396-1401. Keneally R, Szpisjak D. Thoracic trauma in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74: 1292-1297.

Schoenfeld AJ, Dunn JC, Bader JO, Belmont PJ. The nature and extent of war injuries sustained by combat specialty personnel killed and wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq, 2003-2011. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 75(2): 287-291.

Du Bose JJ, Barmparas G, Inaba K, Stein DM, Scalea T, Cancio LC, et al. Isolated severe traumatic brain injurys sustained during combat operations: demographics, mortality outcomes, and lessons to be learned from contrasts to civilian counterparts. J Trauma. 2011; 70: 11-8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.