THE EFFECTS OF LEVOBUPIVACAINE SCALP BLOCK VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE INFUSION ON HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO SKULL PIN INSERTION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE CRANIOTOMY: A RANDOMIZED BLINDED CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY
Abstract
Background & Aims
The application of skull pin holder elicits an adverse hemodynamic response that can have deleterious effects, which can be attenuated by various drugs. This study was aimed at comparing the effects of levobupivacaine scalp block versus intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion on hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion in patients undergoing elective craniotomy.
Methods
This randomized, prospective, double blind, single hospital study was carried out after Institutional Ethics Committee Clearance. Seventy nine patients aged 18 to 65 years belonging to ASA classes I and II undergoing elective craniotomy surgeries were randomly allocated into 2 groups - Group A (n=39): 20mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine scalp block and Group B (n=40): infusion dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg over 10 mins followed by 1mcg/kg/hr for 30 minutes after scalp pin insertion. Intraoperative hemodynamics such as Heart rate (HR), Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood pressure (DBP), Mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at specific intervals.Post operative VAS score were recorded at specific intervals.
Results
The demographic and baseline hemodynamic parameters were comparable. After pinning, the HR, SBP, DBP and MAP were all increased in both the groups which was non significant (p>0.05). At later time intervals the parameters decreased and it was found to be lower in scalp block group. Significant differences in HR and SBP at 10 minutes and 15 minutes (p<0.05) were seen, while for DBP and MAP it was seen at 10 mins after scalp pin insertion. As observed from post operative VAS score scalp block provided better analgesia than dexmedetomidine infusion.
Conclusion
We conclude that though both scalp block with 0.5% levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine infusion is effective in attenuating hemodynamic response to scalp pin insertion, scalp block provided superior results.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
(1) ForohoorM,MacdonaldRL,RothS,Stoodley M, Weir B. Intraoperative variables and early outcomes after aneurysm surgery.SurgNeurol 2000; 54:304-15
(2) Arshad A ,Shamim MS ,Waqas M, Enam SA. How effective is the local anesthetic infiltration of pin sites prior to application of head clamps:A prospective observational cohort study of hemodynamic response in patients undergoing elective craniotomy. SurgNeurolInt 2013;4:93
(3) Bharne S, Bidkar P.U, Badhe A.S., Parida S., Ramesh A.S. : Comparison of intravenous labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block on the hemodynamic and entropy changes following skull pin application: A randomized ,open label clinical trial. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery 2016;11;60-65
Ghignone M, Noe C, Calvillo O, Quintin L. Anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery in elderly; the effects of clonidine on intraocular pressure, perioperative haemodynamics and anaesthetic requirement. Anesthesiology.1988
BrachoPFG,AlneR,BarcelosG,et.al.Levobupivacaine Scalp nerve block:hemodynamics and anaesthesia requirements in supratentorialcraniotomy:P 096.Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:33-34.
Banu O.C., Bilgin H . Effects of scalp Block with bupivacaine versus Levobupivacine on hemodynamic response to head pinning and comparative efficacies in post operativeanalgesia.Journal of International Medical Research. 2017 April:45 (2): 439-450
Geze S, Yilmaz A.A, Tuzuner F. The effect of scalp block and local infiltration on the haemodynamic and stress response to skull-pin placement for craniotomy, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Volume 26, Issue 4,2009, Page 298-303
. Uyar AS, Yagmurdur H, Fidan Y et al: Dexmedetomidine attenuates the hemodynamic & neuroendocrine responses to skull pin head holder application during craniotomy . J NeurosurgAnesthesiol 2008:20:174-179
. Tanskanen PE, Kytta JV, Randell TT, Aantaa RE. Dexmedetomidine as an anaesthetic adjuvant in patients undergoing intracranial tumour surgery: a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study. British journal of anaesthesia. 2006;97(5):658-65
Bala.L,Gupta.B,Ghai.B, Effect of scalp block on postoperative pain relief in craniotomy patients. Journal of Australian society of Anaesthesiologists , April 2006, Volume 2; Issue 4
Nyugen A, Girard F, Boudreault D, et.al. Scalp nerve blocks decrease the severity of pain after craniotomy.AnesthAnalg 2001; 93: 1272- 1276
Ayoub C, Girard F, Boudreault D, et al. A comparison between scalp nerve block and morphine for transitional analgesia after Remifentanil-based anesthesia in neurosurgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia., November 2006; Volume 103 , Number: 5 ,:Page 1237–1240
Hwang JY,Bang,JS,Oh,CW.Effect of scalp blocks with levobupivacaine on recovery profiles after craniotomy for aneurysm clipping: A randomized ,double blinded,and controlled study.WorldNeurosurg 2015;83:108-113
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.