COST EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON OF OPEN SURGERY WITH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL) IN NEPHROLITHIASIS PATIENTS IN H. ADAM MALIK HOSPITAL MEDAN
Abstract
Urinary tract stones are one of the three most common diseases in the field of urology in addition to urinary tract infections and benign prostate enlargement. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) monotherapy has the advantage of taking large stones with minimal morbidity, especially stones in the inferior calyx. This study aims to compare the cost effectiveness of PCNL compared to open surgery seen from all aspects. This study is an analytical study with a cross sectional design to see the comparison of the Cost Effectiveness between open surgery with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with nephrolithiasis in the H. Adam Malik General Hospital Medan in the period of January - December 2018. Based on the results, it was found that PCNL procedures are superior in terms of cost-effectiveness compared to open pyelolithotomy with relatively shorter duration of action, shorter duration of treatment and less complication of action than open pyelolithotomy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Jayaraman, UC., and Gurusamy, A. (2018), “Review on Uro-Lithiasis Pathophysiology and Aesculapian Discussion” IOSR Journal Of Pharmacy. 8(2), 30-42.
Bawari S, Sah AN, Tewari D. (2016),“Urolithiasis: An Update on Diagnostic Modalities and Treatment Protocols.” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Apr 30;79(2):164-74.
Bartoletti R, Cai T., (2008), “Surgical approach to urolithiasis: the state of art. Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism.” May;5(2):142.
Ganpule AP, Vijayakumar M, Malpani A, Desai MR. (2016), “Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review.” International Journal of Surgery. Dec 1;36:660-4.
Zhang FBY, Lin WR, Yang S, Hsu JM, Chang HK, et al. (2017), “Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open stone surgery for patients with staghorn calculi.”Urological Science.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.